3 ms·

How is your browsing experience with that stuff? I used to go nuts with anti-tracking measures, but enough of my browsing experience kept breaking that it just

How is your browsing experience with that stuff? I used to go nuts with anti-tracking measures, but enough of my browsing experience kept breaking that it just didn't feel worth it.

MathMonkeyMan 1y ago
I use LibreWolf at work, and I exempt most internal sites from aggressive anti-tracking stuff, but otherwise it works fine.
tmtvl 11mo ago
It's fine. Sometimes I get annoyed by websites which require JavaScript to show static text (apparently HTML is too difficult?) or which block me with a 'please unblock challenges.cloudflare.com to proceed' (that second one seriously pisses me off when I see it on, for example, the website of the Belgian railways), but by and large I'm fine with just saying 'if it breaks I don't need it'. But I handle my e-mail with isync, mu, and mu4e; and as far as I understand e-mail tends to be a sticking point for those who care for their digital rights. I also don't have Xitter or Facebook or any of that nonsense. If there's one thing I don't like its the fact that NoScript doesn't integrate with Multi-Account Containers. It would be neat if instead of having to temporarily allow GitHub JavaScript and re-disable it when I'm done; I could just allow GH JS in a GitHub or Microsoft container and it only being enabled in that container.
- skydhash 11mo ago
  Libraries documentation that requires javascript to load is the lowest of the bunch in my opinion.
pmontra 11mo ago
My experience with uMatrix: most sites work right away. Others require fiddling with the matrix of media, script, xhr, frames and the third parties serving them. After a while it's easy to remember which ones must be temporary enabled and which ones don't. Sites with videos are a little more difficult. Sites with payments require care. I whitelist the minimum set of scripts that make the sites I use often work. There are usually many scripts that can be left out. If everything fails and it's a one shot site, I start Chrome.

How is your browsing experience with that stuff? I used to go nuts with anti-tracking measures, but enough of my browsing experience kept breaking that it just didn't feel worth it.

MathMonkeyMan 1y ago

I use LibreWolf at work, and I exempt most internal sites from aggressive anti-tracking stuff, but otherwise it works fine.

tmtvl 11mo ago

It's fine. Sometimes I get annoyed by websites which require JavaScript to show static text (apparently HTML is too difficult?) or which block me with a 'please unblock challenges.cloudflare.com to proceed' (that second one seriously pisses me off when I see it on, for example, the website of the Belgian railways), but by and large I'm fine with just saying 'if it breaks I don't need it'. But I handle my e-mail with isync, mu, and mu4e; and as far as I understand e-mail tends to be a sticking point for those who care for their digital rights. I also don't have Xitter or Facebook or any of that nonsense. If there's one thing I don't like its the fact that NoScript doesn't integrate with Multi-Account Containers. It would be neat if instead of having to temporarily allow GitHub JavaScript and re-disable it when I'm done; I could just allow GH JS in a GitHub or Microsoft container and it only being enabled in that container.

skydhash 11mo ago
Libraries documentation that requires javascript to load is the lowest of the bunch in my opinion.

pmontra 11mo ago

My experience with uMatrix: most sites work right away. Others require fiddling with the matrix of media, script, xhr, frames and the third parties serving them. After a while it's easy to remember which ones must be temporary enabled and which ones don't. Sites with videos are a little more difficult. Sites with payments require care. I whitelist the minimum set of scripts that make the sites I use often work. There are usually many scripts that can be left out. If everything fails and it's a one shot site, I start Chrome.