4 ms·
> if they have anything figured out besides "collect spatial data" like imagenet I mean she launched her whole career with imagenet so you can hardly blame he
by porphyra 11mo ago
> if they have anything figured out besides "collect spatial data" like imagenet
I mean she launched her whole career with imagenet so you can hardly blame her for thinking that way. But on the other hand, there's something bitter lesson-pilled about letting a model "figure out" spatial relationships just by looking at tons of data. And tbh the recent progress [1] of worldlabs.ai (Dr Fei Fei Li's startup) looks quite promising for a model that understands stuff including reflections and stuff.
[1] https://www.worldlabs.ai/blog/rtfm https://www.worldlabs.ai/blog/rtfm
- godelski 11mo ago> looks quite promising for a model that understands stuff including reflections and stuff. I got the opposite impression when trying their demo...[0]. Even in their examples some of these issues exist like how objects stay a constant size despite moving. Like missing the parallax or depth information. Not to mention that they show it walking on water lol As for reflections, I don't get that impression either. They seem extremely brittle to movement. [0] http://0x0.st/K95T.png http://0x0.st/K95T.png