3 ms·
> If/when that balance stops, they could turn it into a failed state in a forthnight. You say that as if Singapore has no agency here. And you are under-estim
by eru 1y ago
> If/when that balance stops, they could turn it into a failed state in a forthnight.
You say that as if Singapore has no agency here. And you are under-estimating Singapore's resilience: after all just after independence we were close to the nightmare scenario you are trying to conjure.
> Being this careless by relying on "friends" (in global politics? lol) is ok for a small place like Singapore that can't do anything else anyway. For an ex-empire, it's more suicidal than prudent.
What does it matter that the UK was part of an Empire in the past? Singapore used to be part of the same empire.
And yes, keeping good relations with your allies is extremely important in global politics. This shouldn't be news. Or do you think we should all strive for autarky, like North Korea or 1930s Germany?
- coldtea 1y ago>You say that as if Singapore has no agency here It doesn't. >And you are under-estimating Singapore's resilience: after all just after independence we were close to the nightmare scenario you are trying to conjure. And it didn't happen because some conditions regarding foreign forces balance prevented it. Not because of the "agency" of a barely nascent tiny nation. >What does it matter that the UK was part of an Empire in the past? Singapore used to be part of the same empire. The UK wasn't "part of an Empire", it was the creator, owner, and benefactor of the Empire. That's why it matters. >And yes, keeping good relations with your allies is extremely important in global politics. This shouldn't be news That's irrelevant, since its orthogonal.