> It seems like a lot of people stop there, and either don't investigate problems where it might be a better fit. The AI sceptics do think deeply about where A

> It seems like a lot of people stop there, and either don't investigate problems where it might be a better fit. The AI sceptics do think deeply about where AI might be a better fit. They indeed thought deeply about this, but for every hypthetical use case they could come up with, they had to conclude that - AI has to become much much more reliable to be suitable for this use case - the current AI architectures (as "the thing that bigtech markets") will likely by principle never be able to achieve this kind of reliability This is exactly why these AI-sceptical people got so sceptical about AI, and also the reason why these AI sceptics got so vocal about their opinions.