4 ms·
I still prefer tig[1]. It has probably less features, but also a less cluttered UI and slightly faster interface. But the main use I get from it is for increme
by mariusor 11mo ago
I still prefer tig[1]. It has probably less features, but also a less cluttered UI and slightly faster interface.
But the main use I get from it is for incremental index adding, so maybe not as much as OP.
[1] https://jonas.github.io/tig/ https://jonas.github.io/tig/
- petepete 11mo agoMe too, it’s been my tool of choice for staging hunks for more than 15 years now.
- johnisgood 11mo agoFor that, I use git-cola... for some reason. Even though I live in the terminal.
- mariusor 11mo agoOh, I didn't know it. It looks pretty useful, but it requires more mouse usage than I'd like and its window is not very well suited for tiled window managers straight out of the box.
- johnisgood 11mo agoYeah I have a rule in my i3 config so it gets focused and fullscreen. It does require mouse usage, which is why I wonder why I like it over say, lazygit. I may switch, but yeah, thought one should know of its existence, it is a cool piece of software, too.