3 ms·
This was proposed here on the CSS WG public mailing list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0473.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ww
by jamesr_chromium 14y ago
This was proposed here on the CSS WG public mailing list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0473.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0473.h...
- bzbarsky 14y agoYes, and no one other than WebKit folks seemed to feel it was particularly warranted. Which makes this deliberate spec violation all the more interesting to me. Nothing like sabotaging the standards process by deliberately trying to force the issue in the field when you fail to convince people as part of that process.