6 ms·
Given the analogy, I assume the provider can refuse to disclose information except under a warrant. And that the client and provider can sign a contract forbid
by serbuvlad 11mo ago
Given the analogy, I assume the provider can refuse to disclose information except under a warrant.
And that the client and provider can sign a contract forbidding the provider to disclose the information except under a warrant.
- hunter2_ 11mo ago> I assume the provider can refuse 4A says "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures" so I would think the provider of the service could consider their data to be "their papers/effects" but is the provider a member of "the people" if it's not a sole proprietor?
- _heimdall 11mo agoYes, providers can absolutely deny requests that aren't lawful. A company is within its right to say the data is their property stored on company property and a warrant is required to search it.
- bee_rider 11mo agoThey probably could refuse, but isn’t selling access to surveillance information about you part of their business model? As they say, “we value your privacy…”