4 ms·
But the query is of the whole name. In theory they could nxdomain blocked names. But long ttls and caches would mostly break this as an approach
by lokar 1y ago
But the query is of the whole name. In theory they could nxdomain blocked names.
But long ttls and caches would mostly break this as an approach
- JdeBP 1y agoEver since the Verisign coup in 2003, the world has had the idea of "delegation-only" and suchlike filtering on responses from superdomain servers. More recently, query minimization was invented. Both of these can militate against the root content DNS servers doing that. Better still, one can run one's own private root content DNS server. I've been doing that (in several ways) for a couple of decades. If ICANN decided to blackhole (say) www.microsoft.com. tomorrow, my DNS lookups wouldn't be affected. To affect them, the aforementioned "court action" would have to target Verisign.
- dc396 1y agoI'm curious: how did you implement your "private root content" DNS server such that it keeps up with (valid -- and how would you know?) updates made by the TLD registries via IANA?
- dc396 1y agoYes and no. See QNAME Minimization (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7816.html https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7816.html).