2 ms·

I misunderstood nothing. The British establishment attacked the BBC because it wasnt supportive enough of the propaganda produced by a state conducting a Nazi-s

• adastra22 1y ago
  I think you’re the one employing racist language here, and I don’t think further conversation would be helpful.
• edanm 1y ago
  > a state conducting a Nazi-style genocide (according to the UN). Can you provide a link showing that the UN is saying this? I kind of doubt the UN ever called it a "Nazi-style" genocide, and I don't think anyone serious is alleging anything of the kind (including serious people/groups who do call it a genocide - I don't think they'd characterize what's happening as a "Nazi-style" genocide, and nothing they say implies they think it.)
  • pydry 1y ago
    The UN called it a genocide: https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/09/israel-has-committed-genocide-gaza-strip-un-commission-finds https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/09/israel-has-c... They expressed no opinion about whether the intent on the genocide was due to a culture of racial supremacy. That isnt their job. But, there is a multitude of other evidence demonstrating that it was. This is why the people who try to downplay it on internet forums or elsewhere are exclusively racists, similar to holocaust deniers.
    • adastra22 1y ago
      The UN commission report is highly controversial with a lot of questions raised about their procedure and investigative bias. It is not racist or denialism to make legitimate complaints about the legal basis of an ill-considered report. Comparing it to Holocaust denialism is way out of line.