5 ms·
Wikipedia is usually close enough and most users don't require perfection for their "facts" Ive noticed things like gemini summaries on Google searches are als
by tayo42 1y ago
Wikipedia is usually close enough and most users don't require perfection for their "facts"
Ive noticed things like gemini summaries on Google searches are also generally close enough.
- cratermoon 1y agoClose enough only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades
- brookst 1y agoAnd most human communication
- themadturk 1y agoAnd nuclear weapons. Don't forget the nuclear weapons.
- hn_acc1 1y agoExcept when they glaringly get things wrong like "character X on show Y said catchphrase Z", and two queries produce two different values of X, one right, one wrong. The more I use gemini summaries for things I know a bit about, the worse my opinion of them..
- daotoad 1y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gell-Mann_amnesia_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gell-Mann_amnesia_effect
- withinboredom 1y agoThanks for the Wikipedia link, do you have a source? /s
- johnisgood 1y agoI know you are not serious, but what would constitute as an acceptable source? I could paste its content into an LLM for rephrasing or summarizing or whatever, or just simply ask an LLM about it and put it on my personal website. Would that be an acceptable source? What even is an acceptable source for such things?