2 ms·
It'll be a time sink. Why not do it as dirty as possible now and go back and tune it as time goes on?
by bprater 18y ago
It'll be a time sink. Why not do it as dirty as possible now and go back and tune it as time goes on?
- timf 18y agoSee the original submission, that's why not :-) I want to not only have a backup scheme but also make sure it's restore-tested. Maybe I wasn't totally clear, not planning on a beautiful failover in each place in the beginning (planning failover for the DB at least). Just a tested (even if manual) restore procedure in each situation.