AI-generated commits are useful, as long as they act as a post-processor rather than the author. If the history is already a mess, the tool can structure it chr

AI-generated commits are useful, as long as they act as a post-processor rather than the author. If the history is already a mess, the tool can structure it chronologically, restore the connections between changes, and describe what they mean. The main thing is that it must not change public SHAs, it needs to mark its own entries as machine-generated, and it should keep the original messages saved somewhere nearby