3 ms·
You're being downvoted but I think I get what you're getting at. When I was doing my masters a few months ago, I would get my assignments rejected whenever I d
by tombert 1y ago
You're being downvoted but I think I get what you're getting at.
When I was doing my masters a few months ago, I would get my assignments rejected whenever I didn't run them through Grammarly first.
I have nothing against Grammarly, it's a useful too, but I find that it has the tendency to reject things that (as far as I can tell) are still technically correct but don't have the "AI vibe" to it. I suspect that the graders are running things through Grammarly themselves and rejecting anything that it rejects. This is probably going to become increasingly more common as time goes on.
It's hardly the worst thing in the world, but I do think it will lead to the only "accepted" writing being extremely plain and formulaic.
- hitarpetar 1y agowhat do you mean your assignments were rejected? like rejected for being AI generated?
- tombert 1y agoNo, they weren’t AI generated. They have people judging grammar, and I think they will run it through grammarly to automate it. I wrote the stuff myself.
- hitarpetar 1y agoyeah yeah I got that I'm just confused what justification your graders gave for rejection. I've never heard of a paper rejected on account of grammar