4 ms·
I think this is the beginning of the end of Github. Who has time to read through all these new vibe-coded projects and tools? The READMEs alone are basically es
by pton_xd 11mo ago
I think this is the beginning of the end of Github. Who has time to read through all these new vibe-coded projects and tools? The READMEs alone are basically essays. You can always get a chuckle or two if you read long enough though, so there's that...
"
Acknowledgments
- OpenAI for providing the GPT API
- The conventional commits specification
- The git community for powerful version control tools
"
The future of sharing code is probably dead. Everything is write-only now. Vibe it yourself.
- bakugo 11mo ago> docs(readme): remove acknowledgments section Heh. I wonder if the author asked GPT to remove that section from the readme.
- cube00 11mo agoInteresting that OP removed this [1] from the README and didn't explain why in their commit message or by replying to this comment. [1]: https://github.com/f/git-rewrite-commits/commit/210ada7ec78fa0fc9295d713772b20470cb947ae https://github.com/f/git-rewrite-commits/commit/210ada7ec78f...
- fka 11mo agohonestly, I used to like writing README files before the AI (see my other repos), but I don’t like writing them anymore. GPT does it really well, it may have some mistakes but thankfully, you guys highlight them :)
- cube00 11mo ago[flagged]
- dang 11mo ago"Have curious conversation; don't cross-examine." "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- bakugo 11mo ago> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says What is the "strongest plausible interpretation" of that comment? Because I interpreted it in the exact same way, and don't really see any other possible interpretation.
- dang 11mo agoSince the HN community is obviously not reviewing every commit in all of the OP's repos, I imagine that the last bit ("you guys highlight them") was a light-hearted reference to the current thread.
- ip26 11mo agoCounterpoint: LLMs seem to depend on robust, stable, and easy to use libraries nearly as much as we do. Due to context limitations, vibe-coding a mega-monolithic project in one shot with zero dependencies would be a silly exercise. Therefore, there is still a use for sharing code, even if plenty of it is agentic.
- ninetypercent 11mo agoLLMs only "depend" on libraries because library usage is in their training set. Clearly they don't actually need to use libraries.
- ip26 11mo agoUsing a library keeps the context window smaller than writing it all yourself. I also suspect the whole vibe-coding thing works best when most of the total running code is NOT vibe-coded, and follows carefully defined behavior the fast-and-loose parts can build on top of. Otherwise, why bother to run your vibe-coded website on nginx? Just have the LLM spit out its own novel web server, its own novel TCP stack, its own novel OS for that matter.
- ninetypercent 11mo agoWhy bother indeed!
- what 11mo ago> conventional commits specification Please stop following this. It provides zero value.