4 ms·
Secure Boot doesn't get in the way, I think. I had it disabled for some reason, but I enabled it to test it for you, and my Debian Linux boots just fine. I hav
by npteljes 11mo ago
Secure Boot doesn't get in the way, I think. I had it disabled for some reason, but I enabled it to test it for you, and my Debian Linux boots just fine.
I have no idea about the crypto key situation unfortunately.
- sylware 11mo agoDistros will ignore UEFI secure boot. You have to test with win11 (in dual boot with your fav distro) and some software requiring UEFI secure boot (maybe its status is displayed somewhere in win11 settings).
- npteljes 11mo agoI see. Unfortunately I don't have Win11 to test with.
- npteljes 11mo agoJust tried with my win10, msinfo32 says that secure boot is enabled.
- sylware 11mo agowin10 is not revelant anymore. What about win11? And for instance the game anti-cheats (more anti-open-source than anything else though...) which require TPM/secure boot?
- npteljes 11mo agoNot my personal test, but looks like it's perfectly possible: https://burakberk.dev/complete-guide-enabling-secure-boot-with-linux-and-windows-dual-boot-setup/ https://burakberk.dev/complete-guide-enabling-secure-boot-wi...
- sylware 11mo agoNot win11. It has to be explicit with win11. That said, this shows the sabotage of dual boot by microsoft making it hell, this is proof, and thinking that all motherboard BIOSes will have properly tested secure boot configuration is a dream.
- npteljes 11mo agoWhat do you say to this one? https://medium.com/@ethanppl/dual-boot-windows-and-ubuntu-with-secure-boot-and-full-disk-encryption-9c1c3e6e4050 https://medium.com/@ethanppl/dual-boot-windows-and-ubuntu-wi...