> actually, in some cases, it outperforms C -> https://railsatscale.com/2023-08-29-ruby-outperforms-c/ https://railsatscale.com/2023-08-29-ruby-outperforms-c/

> actually, in some cases, it outperforms C -> https://railsatscale.com/2023-08-29-ruby-outperforms-c/ https://railsatscale.com/2023-08-29-ruby-outperforms-c/ Bit of a clarification after reading the article - that article demonstrates a pure-Ruby implementation [0] outperforming a C extension [1], which is not what I had originally expected when first clicking on the link. [0]: https://github.com/tenderlove/tinygql https://github.com/tenderlove/tinygql [1]: https://github.com/rmosolgo/graphql-ruby/tree/master/graphql-c_parser https://github.com/rmosolgo/graphql-ruby/tree/master/graphql...