4 ms·
At those power levels they would have to use some kind of highly error-corrected modulation and coding scheme to provide enough coding gain to overcome the path
by dbcurtis 11mo ago
At those power levels they would have to use some kind of highly error-corrected modulation and coding scheme to provide enough coding gain to overcome the path loss. I agree they are pretty optimistic, but until they detail their modulation scheme, it's hard to tell.
A few years ago I was experimenting with 900 MHz LoRa for a work project -- we had need to communicate a very small data payload from inside elevator cabs, with forgiving latency requirements. So we took a LoRa board to a hotel building 2 city blocks away from our lab and cranked the coding gain up to the max, which gave us about a 1 byte payload every second. Perfectly sufficient for our application. Astoundingly, we had great copy in our lab even when the doors of the elevator cab were closed, inside a building 2 blocks away. I can't remember the power level, 500mW I think, but I may be wrong.
- firesteelrain 11mo agoPeople use WSJTX software and Q65 mode
- mystraline 11mo agoThis person has a full SDR LoRa transceiver stack and the meshtastic client code. https://gitlab.com/crankylinuxuser/meshtastic_sdr https://gitlab.com/crankylinuxuser/meshtastic_sdr