> therefore there is no need to test it? What evidence do you have that it wasn't tested? Or are you just making an assumption based on one article? Did you

> therefore there is no need to test it? What evidence do you have that it wasn't tested? Or are you just making an assumption based on one article? Did you do any follow up searching? It might have led you to this: https://www.neowin.net/news/mozilla-under-fire-for-firefox-ai-bloat-that-blows-up-cpu-and-drains-battery/ https://www.neowin.net/news/mozilla-under-fire-for-firefox-a...