4 ms·
Why this is obvious extension workflow and vertical tabs or FF Sync aren't? How do you propose they finance development if we consider simple integrations with
by dzikimarian 11mo ago
Why this is obvious extension workflow and vertical tabs or FF Sync aren't?
How do you propose they finance development if we consider simple integrations with zero privacy or customization impact "selling out"?
- BrenBarn 11mo agoThose are also obvious extension workflow. They would need to finance a lot less development if they stopped changing things and just worked on maintaining a limited core functionality including a nice extension system. That's it. Most of their "development" over the last 10 years has been a total waste of time.
- dzikimarian 11mo agoYou really think these things are requiring significant development budget, compared to keeping up with things like wasm, webgpu, grid/flex layouts? Can you really say with a straight face, that not doing vertical tabs or chat shortcut would allow them to operate on much smaller budget?
- BrenBarn 11mo agoI don't know, do you have evidence to the contrary? Either way, all I'm saying is when I look at the UI changes that have been made to Firefox over a period of years, I believe their value to me is closer to zero than their development cost is.
- AuthAuth 11mo agoThe recent change that allows you to easily customize the top bar UI layout in insanely useful. We can now have an out of the box 2 row layout with no CSS.