> Also, standardize the points of rewards programs so we have an idea if we need 104 or 97,000 points to redeem them for the pocket lint prize. This already ex

> Also, standardize the points of rewards programs so we have an idea if we need 104 or 97,000 points to redeem them for the pocket lint prize. This already exists, called money, and obviously won't be used because it's easier to realize how low the number is, but also harder to cancel/inflate away. Broader than that - is there any big generational divide about subscriptions (or, for that matter, many other points on the list)?