3 ms·
Your theory is baseless given that YouTube claimed that decisions weren't automated: > The platform claimed its "initial actions" (could be either the first ta
by dns_snek 1y ago
Your theory is baseless given that YouTube claimed that decisions weren't automated:
> The platform claimed its "initial actions" (could be either the first takedown or appeal denial, or both) were not the result of automation.
- Andrex 1y agoYouTube frequently claims this and are frequently caught lying. (Oh, you really watched this one hour video and reached your decision in an email sent 96 seconds after the appeal was submitted? Yeah okay...) They'll silently fix the edge case in the OP and never admit it was any kind of algorithmic (OR human) failure.
- dns_snek 1y agoI'm aware that there's a chance that Google is lying, I'm just pointing out that their comment doesn't make any sense if they believe that Google deserves the benefit of the doubt.