4 ms·
> Grok is known to have explicit biases And of course a pro-white-supremacist biased LLM is going to falsely exonerate a racist like James Watson with the same
by DonHopkins 1y ago
> Grok is known to have explicit biases
And of course a pro-white-supremacist biased LLM is going to falsely exonerate a racist like James Watson with the same pro-racist biases that Elon Musk programmed it with.
And timonoko also regularly posts Grok generated AI slop bullshit, and even pretends to be a FORTH programmer by having Grog generate code that doesn't do anything like what he claims it does, which should be obvious if he even glanced at the code he was posting. I'd hate to see the kind of Grok-generated buggy crap he unwittingly checks into source code control.
It's strange that timonoko is so compelled to virtue signal so often that he shares Musk's and Grok's racist views. But at least now we know what kind of person he is.
- Dig1t 1y agoJames Watson just stated that intelligence and race are related. Something that every normal person knows and experiences regularly. Calling things that you don’t like racist doesn’t work anymore, nobody cares. There is so much anti white hatred present in media, many people yearn for a source of information to correct for it. One example just this week the economist published this wonderful headline: >With Trump and Vance in power, many pro-natalists believe this is the moment to jump-start baby-making. But some critics see pro-natalism as part of an insidious project to create a whiter America There are hundreds of headlines like this present in publications that are in Wikipedia’s allowable sources list. We are happy to have a source to correct for its bias. You did not address any of the actual information presented, only the fact that you don’t like the people/technology used to create it, which kind of makes my point.