I find it interesting that 80% of the Ocaml discussions here are similar to what I encounter during the change management phase on every complex project I work

I find it interesting that 80% of the Ocaml discussions here are similar to what I encounter during the change management phase on every complex project I work on: "But it’s different from what I’m used and must therefore be bad. Look, the syntax, it doesn’t look like usual. Scary." 15% are people trying to sell their own language of choice sometimes with the argument that "it’s less scary, look". I would be shocked if a mere 5% is actual engagement with the topic at hand sometimes while pointing flaws which are very real. From there, I gather two things, the main one being: maybe Meta was right actually. People are that limited and the syntax should have been changed just to be done with the topic.