3 ms·
That makes sense. But LinkedIn lists are horrible for cache efficient things no? I think there was an article on HN from a Golang perspective padding structs or
by gigatexal 1y ago
That makes sense. But LinkedIn lists are horrible for cache efficient things no? I think there was an article on HN from a Golang perspective padding structs or something such that they are efficient wrt to cache hits.
- rkomorn 1y ago> But LinkedIn lists are horrible for cache efficient things no? LinkedIn Lists you say? (Sorry. (But not that sorry.)) Edit meta sidenote: in this modern meme world, it's virtually impossible to know if a typo is a typo or just a meme you haven't heard of yet.
- gigatexal 1y agolol my phone autocorrected ugh. But you know what I mean. Some grace would be nice.
- stirfish 1y agoLinkedIn lists will tell you they contain one new element, but you have to click on a link and scroll through their suggested new elements to see what it is
- rkomorn 1y agoDo they also always end with an element that tells you what the LinkedIn list taught it about B2B sales?
- mrkeen 1y agoThey are, but you don't tend to keep them around in memory long enough. Start consuming the front before you produce the back.