3 ms·

I can see pros and cons. Preventing data being attached to an error forces more clear and precise errors. Whereas lazy devs could just attach all possible data

• dns_snek 11mo ago
  I don't follow, because there's a possibility that someone somewhere might create a bad overly-generic error set if they were allowed to stuff details in the payload when those should be reflected in the error "type", it's a good idea to make the vast majority of error reporting bad and overly-generic by eliminating error payloads entirely?
• Galanwe 11mo ago
  > Preventing data being attached to an error forces more clear and precise errors. Okay maybe theorically, but in the real world I would like to have the filename on a "file not found", an address on a "connection timeout", a retry count on a "too many failures", etc.
  • audunw 11mo ago
    But also in the real world I may not be interested in any error information for the library I’m using. I’d like to be able to pass a null for the error information structure and have the compile optimize away everything related to tracking and storing error information. I’d like my parser library to be able to give me the exact file, line and column number an error occurred. But I’d also like to use the library in a “just give me an error if something failed, I don’t really care why” mode.
• Xss3 11mo ago
  Id rather have data in a generic error type than no data in a specific error type. How useful is a file not found error type without data (the filename) when the program is looking for 50 files? Not very. How useful is a generic error type with '{filename} not found' as generic string data packed in? Quite.