4 ms·
That's a pretty damning response, sure. The evidence, at least the evidence that I found cited as evidence, appears less damning. Perhaps there is more damnin
by defrost 1y ago
That's a pretty damning response, sure.
The evidence, at least the evidence that I found cited as evidence, appears less damning.
Perhaps there is more damning evidence.
What I found was on the order of the degree of cross copying and similar themes, etc. found in many pools of young writers going back through literary history.
Rona Wang, whom I've never previously heard of, clearly used similar passages from her peers in a literary group and was called out for it after receiving awards.
I would raise two questions, A) was this a truly significant degree of actual plagarism, and 2) did any of her peers in this group use passages from any of Tona's work ?
On the third hand, Kate Bush was a remarkable singer / song writer / performer. Almost utterly unique and completely unlike any contempory.
That's ... highly unusual.
The majority of writers, performers, singers, et al. emerge from pools that differ from their prior generations, but pools none the less that are filled with similarity.
The arc of careers of those that rise from such origins is really the defining part of many creators.
- sarchertech 1y agoIt is evidence because a strong condemnation raises the likelihood that the accusation is true. It doesn’t prove anything, but it supports the theory that they have seen additional evidence. After researching this a bit, it looks like someone from publisher says she admitted it to them. That certainly explains why they weren’t afraid to publicly condemn her.
- thereitgoes456 1y ago[flagged]
- drysine 1y ago>On the third hand On the gripping hand
- occamsrazorwit 1y ago> Perhaps there is more damning evidence. Do you consider the announcement from her publisher that she admitted that she plagiarized passages as a damning response or damning evidence?