3 ms·
This isn't a comment about Sam Altman, but given Gary's track record, why would anyone listen to him?
by option 11mo ago
This isn't a comment about Sam Altman, but given Gary's track record, why would anyone listen to him?
- spiderice 11mo agoCare to enlighten those of us that know nothing about Gary's track record?
- hiddencost 11mo agoHe posts some variant of this kind of anti AI piece roughly every two months for over 20 years. He's been wrong so far. Eventually he'll get lucky, but his track record is abysmal.
- rhetocj23 11mo ago[flagged]
- ta9000 11mo agoI don’t think they kind of comment belongs here.
- ineedasername 11mo agoOn this board, there's an exceptionally good chance a response will come from someone who wrote code or published research fundamental to your daily life, perhaps your favorite sci novel, etc. Not that such questions are ever a reasoned entrance into discussions you aren't burning down-- they're not. But there are still some few places on the internet where a bit if discussion can happen, and this is usually one where the noise doesn't fully drown that out.
- goatlover 11mo agoHas he been wrong about everything? I doubt that. It's also a logical fallacy to dismiss his current argument because he's made wrong arguments before. What he's saying about Altman lying is true or false independent of anything else he's said prior.
- prodigycorp 11mo agopoint here is that his signal/noise is very poor, and the reason why people upvote him is because they agree with the headlines
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- tim333 11mo agoGary is a bit of a stopped clock that always says the same time and is right occasionally. His basic position is these neural network things are not much good, they won't do whatever the current claim is.
- franktankbank 11mo agoWhy comment then?