3 ms·
Of which, perhaps, the author isn't aware? Perhaps the author has very narrow experience in programming languages. Or it's hyperbolic.
by fuzzy_biscuit 11mo ago
Of which, perhaps, the author isn't aware? Perhaps the author has very narrow experience in programming languages.
Or it's hyperbolic.
- moralestapia 11mo ago>Perhaps the author has very narrow experience in programming languages. I got that impression as well. Xi's impressed about types being optional because they can be inferred. That's ... hardly a novelty ...
- forgotpwd16 11mo ago>Only the first and third part are compulsory in Zig, which is kind of puzzling, coming from Java or C. Funny they mention Java that has got type inference few years now. Even C got a weaker version of C++'s auto in C23.
- tialaramex 11mo agoOne of the many things I don't like about C++ is that auto isn't type inference but instead C++ has type "deduction" which is a little different, in some cases a type will be "deduced" even though what you wrote was ambiguous and you may have wanted a different type.