> You can't simultaneously expect people to learn from AI when it's right, and magically recognize when it's wrong. You are misconstruing the point I was makin

> You can't simultaneously expect people to learn from AI when it's right, and magically recognize when it's wrong. You are misconstruing the point I was making. My point is that DK is about developing competence and the relationship between competence and confidence (which I am also claiming evolves over time). My whole point is that the DK effect is not as relevant to LLMs giving wrong answers and people believing them as the author is claiming. As someone else pointed out in another comment, the effect of people believing falsehoods from LLMs has more to do with Gell-Mann amnesia. Tangentially, it actually is possible to learn from AI when it's right and recognize when its wrong, but its not magic, its just being patient, checking sources and thinking critically. It's how all of humanity has learned pretty much everything, because most people have been wrong about most things for most of time and yet we still learn from each other.