2 ms·
Most times it's better to just accept the dynamic nature of the language rather than do this kind of runtime type checking. You'd have to do this `.is_a?` dance
by dlisboa 11mo ago
Most times it's better to just accept the dynamic nature of the language rather than do this kind of runtime type checking. You'd have to do this `.is_a?` dance for every type to have it be reliable.
Even if you implement an "interface" (duck typing) with `respond_to?(:to_app_version)` you still can't be sure that the return type of this `:to_app_version` is actually a string you can call `split()` on.