4 ms·
> Rich appealed both immediately. The first appeal was denied in 45 minutes. The second in just five. > The platform claimed its "initial actions" (could be ei
by rs186 11mo ago
> Rich appealed both immediately. The first appeal was denied in 45 minutes. The second in just five.
> The platform claimed its "initial actions" (could be either the first takedown or appeal denial, or both) were not the result of automation.
Didn't know YouTube can improve their review time from 45 minutes to 5 minutes without automation. I bet it's pure magic.
- candiddevmike 11mo agoI'm sure someone is figuring out a new version of the DMCA that prohibits circumventing data collection "in the name of preserving copyright".
- ronsor 11mo agoIf the DRM can't spy on you, you could be a pirate!
- dlgeek 11mo agoI mean... documenting the details of the investigation to support the first decision and relying on the documented details the second time would easily explain that.
- baobun 11mo agoI would love but probably be horrified to see the documented support for "serious physical harm or death".
- cortesoft 11mo agoI am reading that to mean that they are automatically denying the appeals because it was a human who chose to take the action so it can’t be appealed.