3 ms·

The Latex example should include at least a math formula.

• kccqzy 11mo ago
  And the Haskell example doesn't even include common operators like <$> or <*> or <>. I would've also expected some fancier arrows like =<< or >>>.
  • _piud 11mo ago
    if you're looking for those Haskell operators, you'd find them in the huge banner at the start. maybe i should also add them in the illustrations too.
    • kccqzy 11mo ago
      That unfortunately doesn't show them in context.
• _piud 11mo ago
  agreed. formulae are essential LaTeX. are there any particular glyphs compositions which you'd suggest?
  • fph 11mo ago
    Thanks! For something more complex, I suggest a moderately complex formula with parentheses and superscripts like $f \in \mathcal{C}^0([a,b])$, an equation delimited by \[...\], and maybe a macro declaration with parameters like \newcommand\halves[1]{\frac{#1}{2}}.