3 ms·
But union "busting" isn't selling out, if anything it's keeping to their true cause. Companies don't function well with adversarial units within them, and compa
by guywithahat 1y ago
But union "busting" isn't selling out, if anything it's keeping to their true cause. Companies don't function well with adversarial units within them, and companies don't start out with unions.
Case and point: Valve doesn't have a union.
- NoraCodes 1y agoThe phrase is "case in point", and unionized companies often do quite well.
- ab5tract 1y agoIt’s a privately owned company. This leads to an entirely different relationship between employees and the top layer of management. You have to be very misguided to believe that the c suite in most companies is not engaged in n adversarial relationship with its employees, whether those employees are unionized or not.
- array_key_first 1y ago> Companies don't function well with adversarial units within them This isn't a given, this is just an opinion, and one you didn't bother trying to argue for. Many systems do function much better with adversarial units in them. Governments have the adversarial units of checks and balances. Companies have the adversarial forces of the market. A news paper has the adversarial units of editors to their writers.