3 ms·
That is not getting better at learning. That’s repeatedly re-learning in the same way.
by jebarker 11mo ago
That is not getting better at learning. That’s repeatedly re-learning in the same way.
- meheleventyone 11mo agoAhh, sorry we’re talking past one another then because I hadn’t twigged you were talking about getting better at learning because that’s not what I meant with my initial post! Although I can see why you took that from it. I do like that meta observation though that not only do people get better at prediction through learning they can also get better at the rate at which they improve their predictions.
- jebarker 11mo agoIt’s careless of me to say it’s a definition of intelligence, but I do think that property of being able to improve how you learn and how quickly you learn (especially in response to adversaries doing the same thing) is a clear indicator of intelligence and there’s a good argument that that’s why we developed intelligence. These aren’t my ideas either, I’m just parroting what I recently read in the book “What is Intelligence” by Blaise Aguera y Arcas.