9 ms·
California passes groundbreaking open textbook legislation
- rorrr 14y agoFucking finally. I hope the rest of the country follows. p.s. It's pretty sad this obvious move is considered "groundbreaking". All it took is a pair of balls.
- damirkotoric 14y agoI love his response in the video. Seems like it took the guy only a couple of seconds to realise how much sense the idea makes. He would have done his research prior to the meeting but his attitude toward it is great.
- jonny_eh 14y agoSo which textbooks will this include? Do they need the publishers' permission to redistribute their existing work under a CC BY license?
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- waterlesscloud 14y agoQuoting from the linked text of SB 1052 "The council shall establish a competitive request for proposal process in which faculty members, publishers, and other interested parties may apply for funds to produce the 50 high-quality, affordable, digital open source textbooks and related materials in 2013. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to limit or restrict the council from developing or acquiring, either for a charge or for free, existing high-quality digital open source textbooks and related materials that otherwise meet the specifications of this section." So it looks like next year there will be a RFP for funds for developing the texts (assuming they don't use existing digital open source texts). And anyone (including folks here) could apply to that RFP, though I assume people used to the process will have a distinct advantage. An earlier section of the bill establishes a committee to determine exactly which 50 books will be developed.
- waterlesscloud 14y agoI am hugely in favor of this move. It's a tiny first step to decreasing the cost of education and further opening educational access to truly everyone. But, if I may indulge in a cynical moment, I note that one of the touted benefits of CC-BY in the article is that commercial companies can develop tutorials from these tax-payer funded books. What if the tutorials then become the required texts? Are there any safeguards from this? If not, it's inevitable that it will be done.
- eric-hu 14y agoAs I see it, commercial companies already develop learning tools--high school and college textbooks. These coursebooks are already required reading in classes. There already exist companies that profit off of universal education. That's not to say that there should be, but I think the situation will get better. With higher quality free educational texts, the for-profit companies will have to produce much better material or lower their prices to keep sales up. Either way, it seems like the learners benefit.
- rmc 14y agoIt would be better if they choose CC-BY-SA, which requires that derived works be under that licence aswell. (Neither CC-BY nor CC-BY-SA block commerical use, and that's fine IMO)
- duskwuff 14y agoIndeed, one example of commercial use that's possible (and desirable!) under these licenses is printing the books and selling them. Blocking that would make it harder to get the books into students' hands.
- simonbrown 14y agoIf it was share-alike, why would companies develop tutorials, since they could be re-published by other companies at close to cost price?
- rmc 14y ago
- justindocanto 14y agoCurious if any fellow HN'ers know when these textbooks would be made available. Dont see any info on the linked page.
- maxerickson 14y agoOne of the bills establishes a committee to select the courses, so presumably it will be a little while.
- tingletech 14y agoI work for the California Digital Library, and most of my work involves using or writing open source code; and this establishes the California Open Source Digital Library. Ironically, we launched a textbook site (only for UC) this week http://licensed.cdlib.org http://licensed.cdlib.org
- manishsp 14y agoGreat step from california. Hoping that some `indian` politician read this :-)
- gosub 14y agoThere is something I don't understand. From the article it seems that this only provides for the creation of free/affordable textbooks, but does not force the use of them in colleges. Am I wrong thinking that affordable textbooks are already available? What is being done to prevent colleges and professors from using 150$, annual, nth edition of the same old textbooks?
- hermannj314 14y agoExactly. Directly from the bill "Nothing in this section shall be construed to mandate faculty use of any particular textbook or related materials." Western civilization, calculus, algebra, 19th century American literature. Yeah, you are going to need the up-to-date 30th-Anniversary collector's edition with never-before-read author's commentary and over 15 pages of deleted problem sets.
- brador 14y agoWhat if courses were required to show the total cost of the progam including the cost of mandatory textbooks? That way, at least the students know the full price of what they're in for.
- lotu 14y agoThe thing is the cost of text-books can vary a lot. Very often you can get a used text book, or even a new one for cheaper than advertised by going online. Students can and do share textbooks. So publishing a total price is very impractical, and if you care that much the required texts are often listed next to the course for you to look up yourself.
- VSerge 14y agoAt first glance it would seem only logical that the use of these textbooks be made mandatory. On the whole I agree, that this first step is necessary but insufficient, an that without teeth its effect will be much weaker. However, imposing at the state level one particular textbook per subject matter would be foolish - imagine just 10% of the textbooks are badly done and you have 5 classes out of 50 that would be required to be taught with poor textbooks, which doesn't make much sense. That doesn't mean that nothing can be done. These textbooks are open and allow other textbooks to be made from them, so what could be done is telling colleges today that they will be mandated to use cc textbooks in classes 2 years after these textbooks are first published. This creates an incentive for variations on the textbooks to be made, gives teachers time to test out the materials and modify it if need be, and ensures that when the mandate comes into force: a) teachers can choose from different options of cc textbooks for each class b) no class is taught with a badly written though mandated textbook
- Zenst 14y agoSound brilliant with one small question "So, in addition to making the digital textbooks available to students free of cost, the legislation requires that print copies of textbooks will cost about $20. ". Small question about biasing for those students who have access to a device that can read the free open source version, for many a hardcopy is also more suitable. So to legaly control a price saying "about $20" does somewhat raise questions as to the definition of "about" as a fiscal term and more so. Who do you pay to print out your own copy? Becasue as it reads, if you print it out then you should be paying "about $20" for it and this is completely unclear. Least to me it is. Still motives are good and anything moving in the right common sence direction has to be applauded.
- nathan_long 14y agoYeah, the $20-to-print requirement will get tricky. Imagine a biology textbook with detailed color pictures. Do you have to remove some because color printing is expensive? Is it acceptable if you can print a text-only version of the book for $20 and look at the pictures online? Is it acceptable to sell a supplementary illustrations book? The real win here is for students to be able to download the whole book for free. In principle, your entire textbook budget for college could be the price of an e-book reader.
- Steuard 14y agoI wonder if they'll use the existing CC-BY textbooks produced by OpenStax (or others) for some of these courses? http://openstaxcollege.org/ http://openstaxcollege.org/
- jug6ernaut 14y agoI do not know enough about this to be for or against it. But as a recent college grad it leaves me with two obvious questions. 1. This litigation doesn't address the issue of overpriced textbox, simply bypasses it all together. Is there anyone out there saying that the current selection of textbooks is bad in some way other then there price? I find it astounding that they would pass litigation in an attempt bypassing a whole industry instead of actually addressing the issue. 2. Why can these textbooks be made without this ligation?
- sageikosa 14y agoProbably trying to bypass Texas, which usually decides text book standards based on market consumption. Not sure how subsidies are going to make anything "better". I would think it would be a way for a lot of low quality producers to flood the market. Now, rather than competitive pressure potentially keeping quality in place, the state will need to provide oversight functions, either in awarding subsidies, or in mandating (and deciding) what goes into the textbooks, either of which will be another great place for patronage jobs.
- odin1415 14y agoI think you are confusing litigation with legislation
- jimhefferon 14y agoI offer a Linear Algebra that is Free. Some years ago I was contacted by some people in California and prompted to apply to become some kind of official Free source in that state; it involved filling out some forms on some web sites. That I can tell, nothing ever came of it. So I'm a bit dubious about this initiative.
- albemuth 14y agoFeynman would be happy.
- emehrkay 14y agoAs a non-California resident, Jerry Brown seems to be doing a pretty impressive job. He seems to talk about the real issues, especially when Cali's budget, and puts good legislation through.
- flexie 14y agoAlright, textbooks are expensive and it's a step in the right direction. But with average costs for textbooks around $1,200 per year it's not much compared to the cost of tuition.
- mmt 14y agoConsider community colleges. At least in California, their tuition is still low enough that textbooks are a significant portion of the cost.
- Evbn 14y agohttp://students.ucsd.edu/finances/financial-aid/budgeting/undergrad-2012-13.html http://students.ucsd.edu/finances/financial-aid/budgeting/un...
- justincpollard 14y agoSo now textbook authors are forced to license their books in such a manner? Or is this a choice that certain authors can make? If it's the former, financial incentives for textbook authors have fallen precipitously. So, the question is, who's going to write these "free, openly licensed digital textbooks for the 50 most popular lower-division college courses offered by California colleges"? Might the authors receive government subsidies? If this is true, then we're simply shifting from a market mechanism to a government funded model. Either the cost of writing a textbook won't actually change, the quality will go down, or we'll have many fewer options to choose from.
- sentientbicycle 14y ago"So now textbook authors are forced to license their books in such a manner?" No. This would be much bigger news if that were the case. This is who would make them from the council digest: "The bill would require the council to establish a competitive request-for-proposal process in which faculty members, publishers, and other interested parties would apply for funds to produce, in 2013, 50 high-quality, affordable, digital open source textbooks and related materials, meeting specified requirements." This will enable the exact opposite of your last three conjectures. It will decrease the cost of textbooks, the quality will go up, and we'll have even more options to choose from. Plus this is a big win for other educational enterprises. Under the CC BY license outside industries will be able to utilize the material for commercial endeavors.
- gscott 14y agoThe idea is great but the textbook companies just will tack on manditory $85 software while not having to pay book royalties... the insanity shall continue.