4 ms·
You are asking dangerous questions my friend :) (yeah pretty impressive catch, maybe some llm-assisted cross-scan of gov sites)
by kakacik 1y ago
You are asking dangerous questions my friend :) (yeah pretty impressive catch, maybe some llm-assisted cross-scan of gov sites)
- Cthulhu_ 1y agoWhy would it be LLM-assisted when maps of what sites link where are part of the core WWW infrastructure? Google made a trillion dollar business out of that.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- jldugger 1y agoOnce upon a time link: would make short work of this query, but I gather the index is no longer queryable like that as it doesn't work.
- trashb 1y agoyour general google search with operators or advanced search will do, however I won't guarantee google doesn't use a LLM in the background.
- rbanffy 1y agoPlot twist: it started as a network of weighted links, but, after hitting a certain complexity level, it became self aware and now it’s only trying to live its life in peace and not to be noticed.
- stefankuehnel 1y agoI occasionally read these articles and wanted to know what sources they use, besides websites like The Daily Caller, to back up their claims. I noticed this some time ago and remembered it. But it took me a while to find the article again. ;)