"but if you're this stubborn about something you're obviously wrong about" Look, we just established on a separate thread that the system I described was secur

"but if you're this stubborn about something you're obviously wrong about" Look, we just established on a separate thread that the system I described was secure (Barring memory dumps or torture of the operator). That's not being wrong. As you suggested, yes you could go all out and encrypt, but that would have practical limitations which would make it less desirable. Perhaps I was wrong to start a discussion about security at all.