2 ms·
> He was acquitted of assault, but he admitted on camera to a violation of 18 USC 111. In this specific case we are discussing, he actually was charged with (a
by dragonwriter 1y ago
> He was acquitted of assault, but he admitted on camera to a violation of 18 USC 111.
In this specific case we are discussing, he actually was charged with (and acquitted of) a violation of the provision you reference 18 USC § 111, which is a misdemeanor when done by simple assault [0], after the US Attorney failed to convince a grand jury to indict for a felony violation.
[0] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/111 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/111
- tptacek 1y agoI'm just saying, my friend and trustee has been indicted for putting his hands on a slowly moving ICE vehicle, on the premise of it impeding the driver of that vehicle (by some matter of seconds) from pulling into a parking lot, so mouthing off about pulling DHS people from one location to another seems like a bad idea. This is one of those situations where an axiomatic derivation isn't going to get you past the CourtListener indictment link I'll just post if I need to.