3 ms·
By coming over the land border with Mexico. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg93nn1e6go https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg93nn1e6go Your rhetorical quest
by wat10000 1y ago
By coming over the land border with Mexico. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg93nn1e6go https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg93nn1e6go
Your rhetorical question suggests you thought lots of fentanyl is coming on boats on the ocean. This might be a good moment to pause and reflect on where you get your information and how you reach your conclusions.
- lazyeye 1y agoI understand that fentanyl is not coming Venezuala but I dont think what you've stated is the devastating point you think it is. The US is also awash with cocaine (20k overdoses a year is the tip of the iceberg). I note that none of the replies to my parent comment had anything to say about the scourge of drugs across America. I guess 120k deaths a year is a small price to pay if it makes Trump look bad, right?
- wat10000 1y agoThen why didn’t you say cocaine? The connection of these boats to any drugs is dubious, but you picked a drug that they’re definitely not involved in even if you 100% believe the administration.
- lazyeye 1y ago"The connection of these boats to any drugs is dubious..." this is simply ridiculous. Boats with 3-4 outboards on the back carrying large bails of some unknown "cargo" transiting well-established drug routes is obviously not a "dubious" connection. We also don't know what the intelligence was on the ground which I'm also guessing was quite substantial. Neither you or I have the faintest clue what information was available behind the targeting decisions. Reality and your desire to frame things to justify your hatred of Trump are two completely different things.