7 ms·
The request by itself is fine; it's not about that, but about the nuance within the word choice and what it conveys. It appears the OP is an incredibly valuabl
by npinsker 11mo ago
The request by itself is fine; it's not about that, but about the nuance within the word choice and what it conveys.
It appears the OP is an incredibly valuable community member that has been deeply affronted and hurt by the recent changes. Any attitude other than "I'll move heaven and earth to make this right for you" will likely feel insufficient. Even failing that, I'd at least expect an attitude of "I really, REALLY don't want this to ever happen again". I see neither.
The staff member comes off as robotic because there's zero conciliatory tone or admission of wrongdoing at all in the message. "I'm sorry you feel this way [about the workflow]" puts the onus on OP, and doesn't convey a hint of remorse -- even "I'm sorry our workflow has intruded on yours" would of course be better. "Would you be interested" should be "Would you be willing"; "to talk about this further" could be "so we can better understand what went wrong".
These nuances matter a lot when people are offended. If they're this incompetent at communication over text, I don't know that I'd bother with a video call.
- jameslk 11mo agoFair point. The non-apology is not helping I agree and would have been better left off altogether. I’m guessing this staff person is not very high level and just trying to help and connect the right people. That is, if you’re not very high up in an org, you may not feel you have the authority to speak on behalf of the org as a whole. I don’t have much context to know. Mozilla could of certainly handled it better as an org, that I would agree with.
- metabagel 11mo agoI think the response is completely professional and appropriate. It's a request for more information.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- N_Lens 11mo agoThe fact that your comment is needed to explain these basic nuances says something about the emotional skills of HN readership.
- jjaksic 11mo ago"Hop on a call" is also tone-deaf.