3 ms·

If they're known drug traffickers worthy of execution without due process, why are the survivors being sent home instead of tried for their supposed crimes? ht

• GenerocUsername 11mo ago
  "...for their home countries to prosecute" Does not imply a belief of innocence.
  • pempem 11mo ago
    Is vague enough to mean either thing which in and of itself is a red flag. "To face justice" is both a phrase this administration would use and is more concrete.
  • anigbrowl 11mo ago
    GMAFB. The US is famous for using 'extraordinary rendition' to take custody of people it deems terrorists and either try them or hold them in isolation at military camps. Do you really buy the line that they're being 'sent home to be prosecuted' by the same countries that are condemning these strikes? It seems far more likely that they're being sent home because they don't want to put them in front of a judge.
  • wqaatwt 11mo ago
    That’s a meaningless claim and statement unless they somehow compel their home countries to prosecute them
• pksebben 11mo ago
  > worthy of execution without due process Quite the fascist take you got there, buddy. edit: My bad. On closer reading I believe you might have said that tongue-in-cheek. Reading intent in text is hard.
• deleted 11mo ago
  [deleted]