4 ms·
That's exactly what they did. They didn't want to escalate the conflict, so they didn't end up using it. It's what they refer to as their "trade bazooka", and i
by delusional 1y ago
That's exactly what they did. They didn't want to escalate the conflict, so they didn't end up using it. It's what they refer to as their "trade bazooka", and it's still around ready to be used.
- blibble 1y agoit's not exactly what they did, because a "bazooka" is easy defeated by the same ratchet mechanism the other side will never push enough at once to make bazooka style retaliation the correct strategy
- sealeck 1y ago> because a "bazooka" is easy defeated by the same ratchet mechanism That's an argument for capitulation in general: it's not an argument specifically against extending the field of scope to include services.