3 ms·
Dunbar's number leaps to mind. I wonder what our systems look like at large when we have cause to strengthen our 150 meaningful connections. Would this truly b
by heddycrow 11mo ago
Dunbar's number leaps to mind. I wonder what our systems look like at large when we have cause to strengthen our 150 meaningful connections.
Would this truly be a move back? I've met people outside my social class and disposition who seem to rely quite heavily on networking this way.
- AndrewKemendo 11mo agoThis is exactly the reason Human biological limits prevent the realization of stable equilibrium at the scale of coordination necessary for larger emergent superstructures Humans need to figure out how to become a eusocial superorganism because we’re past the point where individual groups don’t produce externalities that are existential to other groups/individuals I don’t think that’s possible, so I’m just building the machine version
- heddycrow 11mo agoThis resonates with me. I'd love to see the machine version or hear more of your thoughts about what goes into it.
- AndrewKemendo 11mo agoIf you’re really interested at the furthest depth then take a look at my paper: https://kemendo.com/GTC.pdf https://kemendo.com/GTC.pdf If that resonates further let me know at my un on icloud domain
- heddycrow 11mo agoThanks, I will read. I haven't considered what it's like to be interested at the furthest depth, but I will do that now.
- AndrewKemendo 11mo agoThanks! Happy to answer and questions you have or if you have any feedback I’m open to it