3 ms·
Must be. Because anything Microsoft does better especially in the areas of security must be flawed or propaganda </sarcasm>
by barista 14y ago
Must be. Because anything Microsoft does better especially in the areas of security must be flawed or propaganda </sarcasm>
- Mythbusters 14y agoThis HN. What did you expect?
- drhowarddrfine 14y agoIt is funded by Microsoft and Microsoft frequently used NSS in the past when they need a positive report.
- capo 14y agoIt's a legitimate question; same actor released MSFT sponsored studies before: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2009/08/microsoft-sponsors-two-nss-reports-ie8-is-the-most-secure/ http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2009/08/micros...
- mtgx 14y agoWell I remember when Chrome's security was broken for the first and only time, by a research firm. And guess who paid for that to happen? Microsoft. So let me repeat that. Microsoft paid a company to break Chrome's security.
- Torrents 14y agoFirst and only known time?
- krichman 14y agoYes, that's correct, because most of us subscribe to Bayesianism.