> Add complexity only when you have proof you need it. This does assume that said complexity can be added ad hoc later. Often earlier architecture choices make

> Add complexity only when you have proof you need it. This does assume that said complexity can be added ad hoc later. Often earlier architecture choices make additions complex too or even prevent it entirely without a complete rewrite So while the overall message is true there is some liberal use of simplification at play here too In some cases a compromise can make sense. Eg use k8s but keep it simple within that - as vanilla as you can make it