> It seems you are injecting "religiosity" here. What is this, childish echolalia? The "religiosity" was right there in your totally unnecessary quote. > How

> It seems you are injecting "religiosity" here. What is this, childish echolalia? The "religiosity" was right there in your totally unnecessary quote. > How could you possibly know? By inferring from your comment(s), duh! > And frankly, with that handle, it seems you are the one with a "religious" issue. What does this even mean? If you are referring to the passage i quote in my HN profile, that is the opposite of "any religiosity". Read the cited book for edification. > Thank you for motivating me... Hubris to laughingstock.