4 ms·
> look at sources and decide ... which ones are legitimate > I would say that’s something they’re pretty good at. Lol. Lmao, even. Seriously, LLMs are famous
by lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 1y ago
> look at sources and decide ... which ones are legitimate
> I would say that’s something they’re pretty good at.
Lol. Lmao, even.
Seriously, LLMs are famously terrible at this. It's the entire problem behind prompt injection.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prompt_injection https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prompt_injection
They're really good at... ingesting the trash. Yeah, that's pretty much their whole purpose. But understanding it as trash? Not even close. LLMs don't have taste. As another commenter wrote, it's just regurgitating it back.
- n1xis10t 1y agoI like the way this paper puts it: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5.pdf https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10676-024-097...
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 1y agoGotta admit, I agree with the title (still reading it). https://www.wordnik.com/words/bullshit https://www.wordnik.com/words/bullshit The one I care about (near the bottom of the page); really, the only meaningful use IMO, except it can also be a noun: > verb speak insincerely or without regard for facts or truths It's "without regard for facts or truth".
- n1xis10t 1y agoYup, that’s just about what the paper was getting at