3 ms·
I wish this provided a bit more information on the case at hand. I'm guessing that no one suspected a meth lab had been there and thus no testing was ever done.
by adambratt 14y ago
I wish this provided a bit more information on the case at hand. I'm guessing that no one suspected a meth lab had been there and thus no testing was ever done. After all, the family did buy the house and so it must have at least looked safe/appealing.
- dllthomas 14y agoThe bank almost certainly hired people to clean the place and make it pretty for sale. This is only to be expected - everyone cleans a place they are going to sell. If those people cleaned out a whole weird chemistry setup, they should be forced to at least disclose and hopefully test, but that will depend on jurisdiction. If the previous owners cleared out all obvious signs, which might well be expected given that leaving a trail could lead to criminal charges, then it is hard to say - meth contamination may or may not be common enough to merit checking always, I really don't have the data.