3 ms·
This is a disingenuous-at-best interpretation of that story.
by DANmode 1y ago
This is a disingenuous-at-best interpretation of that story.
- zigzagger11 1y agoNot really. Show me where the WEF is publicly planning to get rid of private ownership.
- DANmode 1y agoSibling comments are more than sufficient. You will engage in some form of hair-splitting about what he was saying, or whether or not he actually speaks for the organization. More than enough here if someone wanted to look.
- zigzagger11 1y agolol no. You have no proof and thus will supply none. Your assumptions (about me) are also baseless and frankly pathetic. Is the WEF also planning to remove the US as the world's superpower? It's another of their predictions for 2030.
- DANmode 1y agoHelp me understand what perspective you need to be reading from to see the deleted statements, and go into a defensive strategy for the WEF?
- zigzagger11 1y agoWhich deleted statements would those be. I can see that the original 2016 article has not been deleted. Klaus Schwab referencing it during COVID is also not deleted. Neither is the video on X which has the quote, along with a series of other predictions. So what exactly are you privy to here that the rest of us aren't.
- DANmode 1y agoOkay, same question without the word “deleted”. lol.
- backscratches 1y agoYou have to admit the fact alone that you said it was deleted when it was not makes you the least reliable kind of conspiracy theorist.
- DANmode 1y agoThe point of the conversation (for me!) was never whether or not it was still accessible... See my other comments, you may realize that there's no conspiracy theory, or conspiring, even necessary.