2 ms·
Might wanna spell-check the post if you want any credibility on your claim: > worfklows Observable is already open-sourced and well-respected. Bold and ridic
by bsimpson 1y ago
Might wanna spell-check the post if you want any credibility on your claim:
> worfklows
Observable is already open-sourced and well-respected. Bold and ridiculous to claim your random product is "the successor" of a well-known project, without any obvious relationship to the founders/maintainers of the thing you claim to be aping.
- yandie 1y agoWhat's wrong with `workflows` - out of curiosity? Also, AFAIK, Observable is only JS - this is a Python notebook solution that we are talking here. I'm just an observer - their claim of being successor to Jupyter is definitely hyperbole.
- gus_massa 1y agoThere is an extra F "worFkflows". I don't mind it, but they should fix it anyway.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]